Dear Friends of this Planet,

Spiritual evolution is not the same as ancestral evolution. It has nothing to do with who your great, great grand parents were, neither has it to do with what we have evolved from, as in body shape or whether we evolved from apes, as in Darwin's theory. We may well have physically evolved from apes, but this isn't the issue here.

What is at issue is not what we were, but who we were before we came to live this life. And please realise that you were not another person, you were yourself, living before.

This planet is currently in the 3rd Dimension. It is on the verge of moving to the next two Dimensions. When we die or as some people say "pass-over", we leave the 3rd Dimension and we then reside on the 4th which is the Astral Plane. Once we finally leave the 3rd for good, we will then be on the 4th and when we die or "pass-over" we will then go to the 5th Dimension. The 4th taking the place of the 3rd. We don't actually "go" anywhere. All Dimensions are in the same place, we merely slip from one to the other. That is why clairvoyants can see those that have passed over. They are here all the time, but we can not see them, because they are on a different plane. A ghost is a living entity, could be human, that has lost its 3rd dimensional body, but has not moved into the 4th dimension. They are what is known as "Earth Bound". They live in the 3rd Dimension in a 4th dimensional body. That is why a ghost is more easy to see, than someone who has passed over, but is not a ghost.

Every human has to start somewhere and the only place to start is at the beginning. If you ever hear a person say, "We have all lived many times before", this is an incorrect statement. Unless it applies to a certain group of people that are known to be evolved. It is a nonsense to say all humans have lived many times before, unless you are referring to animal lifetimes as well. All humans have been animals before. This makes some people feel uncomfortable. They don't like to think they were an animal, even bird. And before that they would have come from a group soul, such as an insect. Only the Queen would be ready to move on and take up another life in a higher body, such as a snail, or worm, where independance is learned. This is spiritual evolution. It is what your spirit has been in the past. It makes no difference whether you believe it or not. This is how it is.

Most humans have been a domestic animal, before their first incarnation. If you are a skeptic, please read carefully what I have to say.

Why are there some people who just don't know how to be sociable, caring, honest, loving, considerate, calm, intelligent and wise?

Why are there also people who do know how to be all of the above?

What is the fundamental difference between these people? I will tell you. The people who are not any of the above, are that way because they have not learned how to be, over the course of incarnations, human or animal. Please try and grasp this. A domesticated animal, living with a warm and loving family, learns to be these things. A cat for instance who is well fed, has a special place to sleep, is stroked and groomed, cuddled and see humans inter-acting lovingly, brings this into their life, even in their very first incarnation as a human. Then let's say a dog lives with a family who feeds it poorly, kicks it frequently, neglects it, yells at it and sees the man of the house having sex with his off-spring, brings that with them into their very first incarnation as human. Could you in all fairness expect a person male or female to understand social skills, to know how to love and care, if this was what they brought with them? It should be quite clear who are lowly evolved or unevolved and who are average and who are highly evolved. It is not so clear who is Very Highly evolved. These people are so different from the ordinary person, that they are often misunderstood.

This is why criminals should not be punished. Punishment will not teach them to love, to care, to be sociable creatures. It is learned over life-times. It does teach them that violence is the only way to survive. That you will never get anywhere unless you learn to take what you want, regardless of consequence. Locking them up may protect the community, but for how long? Aren't most criminals worse when they get out? Don't they usually keep in touch with all the friends they made inside? And don't they usually offend again? So why do we lock them up at great expense to the taxpayer? We have been locking them up, because we have not known what else to do with them. We lock them up to punish them and to get rid of them and to teach them a lesson. But has this line of thought and action been productive? And what sort of a person will they be in their next life, after one spent mostly in jails? Why do you think men pack rape? The reason is, they are in their first human incarnation and they have pack raped before as a dog, wolf, or some other animal. They were not punished then, so they do not think it is a possibility they will be punished again. They are merely following their instincts. This does not make them evil. Most unevolved and lowly evolved people are not evil. An evil person is a more highly evolved person, driven by power, greed or perversion who does know that what they are doing is wrong. Even a person the top end of average evolution can be evil, if they do not realize their incarnation, do not care and are unafraid of the consequences. It would be very rare for a Highly evolved person to be evil and even rarer for a Very Highly evolved person to be evil, however it would not be impossible. The gods of the underworld have been human and are as such Very Highly evolved, but have chosen a path that does not beneftit them spiritually. They are still evolving.

Some people have thought that I am indicating that I am Very Highly evolved. I have never said that. I have always said that I am Highly evolved. I am no where near the top and I do know my weaknesses and faults. Every person living, incarnate and discarnate has a hierarchical position. There are no two souls at exactly the same position. We all have a number. Even identical twins may be side by side, but one would be higher than the other, if even only by 1 point.

The very first incarnation is always male. This explains why the jails are so full of men and not so many women. By the time a human incarnates for the second time, they have already learned something. It may be that "crime does not pay", or that jail is an unpleasant place to be avoided if at all possible. However not much is gained as in experience to bring with you until after the fourth incarnation, when you have emerged from the sludge tray (unevolved), to the area of Lowly evolved. There are still many criminals in this area. They may not be Bank robbers, murderers or rapists, though the above are here also. Child abusers, vandals and litterbugs could be in this section. Paedophiles are usually more highly evolved, usually the top end of average and know that what they are doing is wrong. That is why they are intelligent, clever and resourceful. They have chosen to follow the negative path. These are people to punish, if you are going down that road.

Now there is something important I want to bring to your attention. If you will look at the diagram, you will notice that the sludge tray is full. This means that the unevolved usually have lots of friends, because there are lots of people like them to be friends with. Once the pyramid is entered, where evolution is now taking place, (in fact every soul is evolving, though it may seem that we are devolving) there is also a large number of souls here too. As one becomes more evolved, there are less and less. Highly evolved people often have less friends than average and lowly evolved people. Only people who have made the effort to surround themselves with like minded people have many friends when they are highly evolved. The Very Highly evolved have less friends again, as they are few and far between. It is very lonely at the top. Why? Because no one understands you. No one knows as much as you. Many lesser evolved people think you are wrong, weird and even crazy. This is one reason why a Very Highly evolved person will most likely never be in a position of leadership. They will get no votes what so ever. Only other Very Highly evolved persons will recognise them and they are few and far between. Even though I am not at the Very Highly evolved level of evolution, people do not take seriously what I have to say. They are quick to criticize my plan. Even though I have told them I have spent 17 years working on it. Even though I say there is a good reason for everything. If they can not grasp it straight away, they think I am wrong. They think they can do it better. That is okay, if they do it better. But they are usually all talk, all criticism and no action. Tell them to form their own Party and they will laugh. What help to humanity is that? I am doing my best to put forward a workable new way of doing things. But so far I have no support what so ever. Pauline Hansen had the support of about one million in her hay day. But what exactly did she stand for? And would she have made a good Prime Minister? I don't think so, but many people loved her, even though she was coming from a place of fear, hatred and discrimination.

I am coming from a place of love, caring, nurturing, creativity and respect. What could be better than that? So far I have not registered with the Search Engines and have just been handing out a few cards. If I am registered with Search Engines, I am leaving myself wide open to attack or even to be detained for subversion or sedition. This is not against the law as far as I know. But such things do happen. Hopefully it will not come to that. It is of course against the law in countries like China and it will be against the law in Hong Kong soon.

So you should understand now why it is a lot easier for a person of average evolution to get elected, than someone of higher evolution. A person of average evolution has the support of like-minded people, of which there are many. They also have the support of the lesser evolved, of which there are more. They can relate to and understand that person or candidate. A person more highly evolved than average relates to less people. They can understand a lesser evolved person, as they have been there, done that, and can see where they have gone wrong, but a lesser evolved person can not understand the more highly evolved and can not relate to them and in their ignorance, often think they are wrong or ridicule them. This is a very difficult problem to solve.

The reason a hierarchical system of governance is better as opposed to Democracy is this: There are in fact several reasons, firstly you have only one governing body and no Parliament. Having a Parliament consists of paying not only the Opposition's salaries, but all Parties who hold seats in Parliament. (When you think about it, how absurd is it to pay the salary of someone who opposes you.) This is quite a huge cost. Many of these people do very little for the money they earn. Secondly nothing can go through unless the bill is passed, and there are various ways of sneaking bills through. Sometimes bills are held up, just to be ornery, recalcitrant or intransigent, as in a filibuster. Also nothing ever seems to get achieved. If you listen to Question Time, it is a matter of one person hurling an insult at another, or pointing out an indiscresion, then the other person retaliates and that's the end of it. Noting seems to get rectified.

Then there is the fact that the Party is elected by the majority vote, and as I have pointed out the majority of any population is less than Highly evolved. And in the case of the Liberals, of course they did not even get anywhere near the majority of the votes.

Another factor is that even if another party gets elected, you get the same system of governance, so all the things you do not like are likely to remain unchanged. Only the personality of the Leadership actually changes. The choice you have for the Leadership is firstly the choice of the Party. It is whoever they select.

Another fact is: The party most likely to win an election is often the one with the most campaign funds to spend, the Party with the most television coverage and the Party with the most charismatic candidate. I would never call John Howard charismatic, however who else was he up against that had more charisma? I actually think Kim Beazley has more charisma, but the Tampa issues was a defining moment in history and just showed how the Australian public feels about refugees lobbing into our country uninvited.

With a hierarchy, once all the positions are filled with sensitive, caring, loving, stable, compassionate, fair and ethical persons, the next person in line is known and is constantly training for the position at the top. Where there are 21 in the Counsel and the top position becomes vacant for whatever reason, say retirement or death, the next position female, moves into the position, without a vote. It is automatic and accepted. If the person was not right for the job, they would have never risen to that position. Every female then moves up one position. The same goes for men, though they may not take the top position. This then leaves the bottom position vacant, but even this would not be filled by an outsider. There is an inner circle of 21and an outer circle of 64 and each of them has a position and a natural progression to the top. Of course there may be times when this is unable to apply as in the case of one person under performing and another person over performing. There may be a time when two people are asked to change places, or if someone retires or dies, the person below may be asked to remain in their position and another person asked to take it. This may happen a lot at the beginning as positions are sorted out. This is a time that if a vote was taken, a veto vote would be needed.

Please do not reject this idea outright. You need to at least consider what I have said, before you go off on a tangent, like has happened already. It may take a while to be accepted, but if you look at it with "seeing" eyes, you will see more than just what I have written. If you were to ask a seer which they thought was the best system, I guarantee they would choose mine, and all seers are either Highly evolved or Very Highly evolved. Of course it is no use asking an ignorant person, why would they 'know' what was the best system? They might 'think' they know, but in reality they are spiritually impoverished and have no idea at all.

I want to get back to evolution again. It is very dangerous for the average person and above for great wealth to be in the hands of the unevolved. Footballers, wrestlers and boxers and some Rock stars fall into this category. I can hear some people saying all sorts of things at this point. These people share many things in common and they share none with me. They are mostly unevolved or lowly evolved and should not be able to earn large amounts of money. They can not deal with it responsibly. They are selfish and self-serving and must not be worshipped in the manner they are at present. They are not worthy of any attention. Playing a game well should be just that, unless it is a game of extreme skill, such as golf and tennis. It is fine for other unevolved and lowly evolved people to enjoy watching the sport played. This is not a problem or concern. The problem is the huge sums these people are paid for doing very little work to warrant it.

A famous person must be responsible for their actions; therefore they must behave with dignity and decorum. Getting drunk, road and air rage, knocking people unconscious for money is immoral, degenerate and debauched. Their disfunctional lives are only exacerbated by wealth. These people sometimes liken themselves to God and treat women as subservient to them. It is also the behaviour of the lowly evolved. Worshipping people like this is fairly sickening to me and I hope many others. To put a man on a pedestal that has shoved his finger up the anus of another person in full view of the public and thinks this is acceptable, is beyond belief. And then hiring him again for huge sums of money once the dust has settled, is staggering. But then it isn't really, because it is done by other lowly evolved people.

What is also staggering to me is that some highly evolved people think they are equal to these same lowly evolved people. It is like saying that a kilo of lead is equal to a gram of platinum. I could understand if the lead thinks it is equal to the platinum; because it weighs more, this happens all the time: but I find it incomprehensible that the platinum thinks it is equal to the lead. The fact is they are not equal. As you can now determine, I am not egalitarian: Though I am in the over all huge scheme of things. For platinum to feel equal to lead is a denial of one's level of evolution. It should be that the higher evolved you are the more rights you have. But in the current system of justice, the victim often has less rights than the perpetrator. The person with the most money often has the most rights, regardless of how that wealth was obtained.

The lead always wants to settle disputes with violence. Lead hasn't learned who to respect, often disrespecting those above themselves. They are unreasonable; they kill for the sake of it. They are serial murderers; they are cruel as in torturers and they never listen to reason. Yet these very people have crept into positions of authority and power: Not so much in Australia as in Asia and the East. If the more highly evolved do nothing, this will eventually happen here too. I was almost raped by a detective once. My shop was broken into and I called the police and almost got myself raped. I bit him and drew blood. Now a days one would think twice about doing that in case of contact with HIV or hepatitis.

Lead does not appreciate beauty and when in the presence of beauty often destroys it. It is lead that orders the bombing of countries that have not attacked them first, and disregards all life except their own kind. It is lead that accuses people of doing despicable things, and then does the same things and believes they are beyond reproach.

People need to get this point clear in their minds. If you have a different view, try writing down that difference. Read it back to yourself the next day and see if you still feel the same way. Try to disprove what I am saying, but write it down, so that you are sure of what you are saying. Weigh what you think is a better way than mine against all of my ideas and policies. If you are convinced that your way is better, either do one of 3 things. Do nothing else, publicly advocate your ideas, or write to me with your ideas and I might incorporate them into mine, giving you credit for your idea. There are a million things I have not written about as yet. And I recognise that there are a million ideas out there that are as good as mine, if not better. I will not take on what I discern to be a poorly thought out idea.

I believe that the unevolved and the lowly evolved have the right to self determination as I believe that I also have that same right. But I do not believe that the unevolved and the lowly evolved should practice this right at my detriment or any other more highly evolved person's detriment. My right to self determination will not harm another person, unless inadvertently or accidentally. Lowly evolved people need to get their practice on other lowly evolved people, who are making similar mistakes to themselves.

If you are a person that knows little about spiritual evolution, it is now that you must learn. This first thing you must learn is where you are on the evolutionary ladder. If you have not read or heard of this kind of evolution and you have not worked out for yourself that this evolution is the important one to know about, then I suggest you discuss it with your friends. Perhaps you know of someone who would know about it, or you might know about it and can discuss it with those that don't. The subject needs to be talked about more.

LINKS Home Page Lightworkers Unite!

Sign my Guestbook View my Guestbook